Language, migration, and ChatGPT

Authors

  • Jasper Kyle Catapang Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
  • Ariane Macalinga Borlongan Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
  • Mikhail Alic C. Go Yokohama City University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22452/jml.vol35no2.9

Keywords:

Migration Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence Migrant Integration, Digital Labor Precarity, AI Ethics and Communication

Abstract

This article examines how ChatGPT is reshaping the linguistic and social conditions of contemporary migration by situating its impact within discussions on integration, labor precarity, and the ethics of new technologies. It shows how large language models now participate in communicative tasks that migrants once managed solely through human interaction, including navigating government procedures, consulting medical professionals, and handling routine daily exchanges. These examples reveal how ChatGPT can broaden access to information while also producing errors that may create serious challenges for migrants who depend on reliable guidance. The article further considers how automation in service and clerical roles, many of which employ
migrants, heightens existing job vulnerabilities. Ethical concerns such as misinformation, impersonation, bias, and opaque decision processes are treated as structural risks that affect migrants unevenly, especially when time, language resources, or institutional knowledge are limited. The discussion concludes by identifying digital competence as a necessary component of migrant integration, emphasizing the importance of understanding both the capabilities and the boundaries of ChatGPT. Through this perspective, the article contributes to migration linguistics by illustrating how AI systems are becoming part of the communicative environments that migrants must learn to navigate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Catapang

Downloads

Published

22-12-2025

How to Cite

Catapang, J. K., Borlongan, A., & Go, M. A. (2025). Language, migration, and ChatGPT. Journal of Modern Languages, 35(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.22452/jml.vol35no2.9