https://jml.um.edu.my/index.php/JML/issue/feed Journal of Modern Languages 2022-08-02T10:52:07+08:00 Journal of Modern Languages fbljml@um.edu.my Open Journal Systems <p><strong>The Journal of Modern Languages</strong><span class="apple-converted-space"> <strong>(JML)</strong><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal published by the Faculty of Languages and Linguistics at Universiti Malaya in Malaysia. It </span>is devoted to publishing research reports and discussions that represent an important contribution to current understandings of central issues in the broad field of modern language studies. Founded in 1983, the Journal primarily published papers annually that describe scientific studies of language use, processing and development. In 2019, JML began to welcome the submission of manuscripts in the form of review papers and meta-analyses, and from 2020, the Journal has started publishing two issues per year.</p> <p><strong>JML</strong> aims to report state-of-the-art research and to provide a forum for both established experts and emerging talent. The Journal encourages interdisciplinary approaches to language research and acts as a reference for all those interested in modern language studies.<br /><br /></p> <p><strong>Focus and Scope:</strong> JML welcomes papers in (but not restricted to):</p> <ul> <li class="show">Applied Linguistics</li> <li class="show">Corpus Linguistics</li> <li class="show">Descriptive Linguistics</li> <li class="show">Discourse Studies</li> <li class="show">Psycholinguistics</li> <li class="show">Sociolinguistics</li> <li class="show">Translation and Interpretation</li> </ul> <p><strong>Peer-review Policy: </strong>Manuscripts submitted to JML first undergo editorial screening, followed by peer review by at least two anonymous reviewers. As regards the originality and similarity index, manuscripts may be checked via the Turnitin software. However, in our experience, there have been cases of plagiarism in which the software has failed to detect. In these cases, if the editorial boad and/or reviewers doubt the originality of any part(s) of the work under review, the Editor-in-Chief's decision is final.</p> <p><strong>Third-Party Content in Open Access papers</strong><br />If you are considering to publish your paper with us but it contains material for which you do not have Open Access re-use permissions, please state this clearly by supplying the following credit line alongside the material:<br />Title of content; author; original publication; year of original publication; by permission of [rights holder].<br />This image/content is not covered by the terms of the Creative Commons licence of this publication. For permission to reuse, please contact the rights holder.</p> <p>JML welcomes article submissions and charges <strong>no publication fee</strong>.</p> <p><strong><span class="apple-converted-space">Print ISSN: 1675-526X<br />Online ISSN: 2462-1986<br /></span></strong><strong><span class="apple-converted-space">Publisher: University of Malaya<br /></span></strong><strong><span class="apple-converted-space">Publication type: Online<br /></span></strong><strong><span class="apple-converted-space">Indexing:</span></strong></p> <p><strong><img src="https://jml.um.edu.my/public/site/images/fbljml/mycite.png" alt="" width="195" height="71" /></strong><strong> </strong><strong><img src="https://jml.um.edu.my/public/site/images/fbljml/ebsco_logo2.png" alt="" /></strong></p> https://jml.um.edu.my/index.php/JML/article/view/30848 Department Store Surveys as a Methodology in the Study of Linguistic Variation 2021-09-12T18:58:26+08:00 Shangxin Zheng marat.zheng@gmail.com Xiaomei Wang xmwang@xmu.edu.my <p>This article provides an overall review on the methodology of Department Store Surveys (DSS), which refers to sociolinguistic surveys taking place in department stores in urban speech communities accompanied with unobtrusive observation techniques. DSS originated in Labov’s pioneering study on the social stratification of (r) in New York City department stores, and has been applied to various speech communities thereafter. One of the most recent studies, extending DSS by adding another interviewer with a different identity, is discussed in particular. It is proposed that DSS allows us to study linguistic variation in two equally effective ways. At the micro-level, it offers insights into the structuring of a speech community with reference to linguistic variables; also, it informs our understanding of macro-level language use in public settings in a multilingual society. Finally, the strengths and limitations of DSS are evaluated in terms of data collection in urban speech communities. </p> 2022-07-31T00:00:00+08:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Modern Languages https://jml.um.edu.my/index.php/JML/article/view/33713 Socio-cognitive and Professional Practice Perspectives on Chairperson Statements 2022-01-13T16:15:47+08:00 Vivian Chiew Ling Yee vivian@uniten.edu.my Cecilia Yin Mei Cheong ceciliac@um.edu.my <p>The study establishes the Malaysian chairperson statements from the socio-cognitive and professional practice perspectives. It identifies the move structure of 53 chairperson statements and metadiscourse strategies based on questionnaire and interview responses collected from 39 investors and 3 professional members. Three informational moves are used to assist investment decisions while seven non-informational moves are intended to build good image and good will, and to ensure compliance to requirements. <em>Self-mentions</em>, <em>attitude markers</em>, <em>frame markers</em> and <em>transitions</em> are also used to affectively realise the promotional and interpersonal moves. The chairperson statements are interdiscursively informational, promotional, and public relational. This research highlights pedagogy implications for English for Professional Communication (EPC) programmes, and recommendations for future studies.</p> 2022-07-31T00:00:00+08:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Modern Languages https://jml.um.edu.my/index.php/JML/article/view/27667 Maimani Language and Lawati Language: Two Sides of the Same Coin? 2022-05-17T10:53:40+08:00 Said Humaid Al Jahdhami saidj@squ.edu.om <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The concomitance of several minority languages side by side with Arabic has played a significant role in enriching Oman’s linguistic diversity. Associated largely with the home domain, the vitality of these languages is highly dependent on the attention availed by their own native speakers to their usage and inter-generational transmission. The existence of some of these languages is not commonly recognised, nor is their status failsafe. Owing to a certain degree of lexical resemblance amongst these languages, inter alia, some of them are often viewed and presented as dialects of one another rather than distinct languages of their own, a fact that has fed into unmeant obliviousness of their existence. Unbeknownst to many people even in Oman, Maimani is one unique case that merits exploration. Due to some unsubstantiated linguistic and ethnic considerations, Maimani is often mistakenly viewed as a dialect diverging from Baluchi, an Indo-Iranian language spoken in Oman as well as other homeland countries such as Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan. This paper, to that effect, is an attempt to cast some light on this understudied language and to bring it some due notice. A closer look at a sample of its lexicon based on the Swadesh one hundred word list reveals that Maimani has a slight portion of shared lexical items with Baluchi and a minimal degree of mutual intelligibility. Contrary to expectation, Maimani has plenty of common lexical items with Lawati, another nearby member of the Indo-Iranian language family that is not commonly linked to Maimani. The findings show that Maimani lexical resemblance and mutual intelligibility to Lawati is greatly significant that they appear to be dichotomous varieties branching from the same language.</span></p> 2022-07-31T00:00:00+08:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Modern Languages https://jml.um.edu.my/index.php/JML/article/view/26514 Evaluating the Curriculum for M.A. English Translation in Iran: Is the Curriculum Effective for Students? 2021-12-14T22:28:09+08:00 Aynaz Samir aynazsamir@yahoo.com <p>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the current curriculum for M.A. English translation in Iranian universities regarding the students’ perspectives to find its deficiencies and to propose some recommendations to make the curriculum compatible with students’ needs. The study was done based on a quantitative research design using a researcher-made questionnaire. The questionnaire was administrated to 341 M.A. and Ph.D. translation students in Iran. The data from the questionnaire were analyzed in descriptive statistics and an independent samples t-test. The results revealed that the current curriculum was moderately effective in providing the students with the necessary translation competencies. The results indicated some courses including <em>Translation Workshop</em>, and <em>Theories of Translation</em> were effective. Whereas, some courses such as <em>Literary Criticism</em>, and <em>Philosophy of Education</em> were not effective enough to improve students’ theoretical knowledge and practical translation competencies. Hence, modifications of the contents or curriculum are needed. To improve the curriculum, the top three practical courses should be added to the curriculum, and they include <em>Translation of Technical Texts</em>, <em>Interpretation Workshop</em>, and <em>Bilingual Editing Skills</em>. Additionally, the results of the independent samples <em>t</em>-test showed that M.A students agreed more than Ph.D. students that courses such as <em>Persian Writing</em>, <em>English Writing</em>, and <em>Sight Translation</em> should be added to the M.A. translation curriculum. Overall, the findings provide insights to the curriculum reform which is needed in the area of English translation.</p> 2022-07-31T00:00:00+08:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Modern Languages