Combating unethical publications in Iraqi higher education: A pre- and post-intervention programme assessment

Main Article Content

Haneen A. Haleem
Mohammed M. Kadhum
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4732-3646

Abstract

This study examines the Responsible Publishing Initiative (RPI), a new intervention programme developed under University of Babylon’s academic research policy to combat unethical publishing among research students by addressing predatory or hijacked journals. The study aims to: i) examine the awareness and practise of scholarly publishing among research students before and after participation in the new intervention programme; ii) analyse the publication data of research students before and after participation in the new intervention programme. The results show that at least 37 per cent of students have published in predatory journals. After participating in the RPI programme, it was found that students' awareness had increased and the number of publications in predatory journals had decreased significantly. The initial success of the programme demonstrates the importance of educational interventions to promote academic integrity. The study also emphasises the need for continuous monitoring and evaluation to ensure the long-term effectiveness of the newly proposed initiative. This research contributes to the broader academic discourse on sustainable development and is in line with UN SDG Goal 4 (Quality Education) and Goal 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) by promoting a culture of integrity and rigour in Iraq's academic publishing landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Haneen A. Haleem, & Kadhum, M. (2025). Combating unethical publications in Iraqi higher education: A pre- and post-intervention programme assessment . Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 30(1), 112–134. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol30no1.5
Section
Articles

References

Abalkina, A. (2021). Do hijacked journals attract dishonest authors? In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2021), (pp. 1–5). International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI). https://www.issi-society.org/proceedings/issi_2021/Proceedings%20ISSI%202021.pdf

Abalkina, A. (2024). Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75(4), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24855

Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60

Callaghan, C. W., & Nicholson, D. R. (2020). Predatory publishing and predatory journals: A critical review and proposed research agenda for higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(10), 1433–1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1695762

Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Skidmore, B., Ahmadzai, N., Grudniewicz, A., & Moher, D. (2018). What is a predatory journal? A scoping review. F1000Research, 7, 1001. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2

Dadkhah, M., & Borchardt, G. (2016). Hijacked journals: An emerging challenge for scholarly publishing. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 36(6), 739–741. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw026

Dadkhah, M., Maliszewski, T., & Jazi, M. D. (2016). Characteristics of hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Our observations in the academic world. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 37(6), 415–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2016.04.002

Donev, D. (2020). Predatory in scientific publishing-a burning issue in science. International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare, 8(2), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijbh.2020.108-112

Frandsen, T. F., Lamptey, R. B., & Borteye, E. M. (2024). Promotion standards to discourage publishing in questionable journals: A follow-up study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102895

Frandsen, T. F., Lamptey, R. B., Borteye, E. M., & Teye, V. (2022). Achieving a professorship with proper academic merit: Discouraging questionable publishing. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 53(3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2021-0021

Hegedűs, M., Dadkhah, M., & Dávid, L. D. (2024). Masquerade of authority: Hijacked journals are gaining more credibility than original ones. Diagnosis, 11(3), 235-239. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0082

Jalalian, M., & Dadkhah, M. (2015). The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 2015. Geographica Pannonica, 19(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.5937/geopan1502073j

Kumar, A., Siwach, A. K., & Devi, P. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited papers on predatory publishing. Science & Technology Libraries, 43(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2023.2200224

Macháček, V., & Srholec, M. (2022). Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(3), 859–887. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00213

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M. T., Ahmadzai, N., Alabousi, M., Barbeau, P., Beck, A., Daniel, R., Frank, R., Ghannad, M., Hamel, C., Hersi, M., Hutton, B., Isupov, I., McGrath, T. A., McInnes, M. D. F., … Ziai, H. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature, 549(7670), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/549023a

Moses, J. M., & Shem, W. (2022). Predatory publications among academics in Nigerian universities: A narrative review. World Scientific News, 173, 149–161.

Nicholas, D., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Herman, E., Clark, D., Xu, J., Abrizah, A., Świgoń, M., Watkinson, A., Sims, D., Jamali, H. R., Tenopir, C., & Allard, S. (2023). Early career researchers and predatory journals during the Covid-19 pandemic. An international analysis. El Profesional de La Información, 32(1), e320117. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.ene.17

Nisha, F., Das, A. K., & Tripathi, M. (2020). Stemming the rising tide of predatory journals and conferences: A selective review of literature. Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), 67(3), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v67i3.32442

Pinto, A. L., Dias, T. M. R., & Semeler, A. R. (2021). How to spot fake journal: 10 steps to identify predatory journals. In E. Bisset Álvarez (Ed.), Data and Information in Online Environments (DIONE 2021) (pp. 136–144). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77417-2_10

Rawas, H., de Beer, J., Al Najjar, H., & Bano, N. (2020). Falling prey to predatory journals: Experiences of nursing faculty. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 13, 100222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100222

Schira, H. R., & Hurst, C. (2019). Hype or real threat: The extent of predatory journals in student bibliographies. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v14i1.4764

Schira, H. R., & Hurst, C. (2024). University students’ knowledge of potentially predatory journals: A focus group analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(5), 102926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102926

Taylor, Z. W. (2019). The hunter became the hunted: A graduate student’s experiences with predatory publishing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 35(6), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-019-09639-7

Webber, N., & Wiegand, S. (2022). A multidisciplinary study of faculty knowledge and attitudes regarding predatory publishing. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 10(1), eP13011. https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.13011

Wilson, N. (2024). Predatory journals. BioScience, 74(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad104