Malaysia’s scholarly publishing ecosystem: An insider appraisal of established and emerging models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol30no3.5Keywords:
Scholarly communication, Open access, Academic publishing, Scholarly journals, University-based journalsAbstract
This article assesses Malaysia’s scholarly publishing ecosystem by analysing five models: university-based journals (UBJs), society journals, independent academic-led publishing initiatives, commercial partnership agreement, and ministry/government-sponsored journals. Drawing on over two decades of experience and the authors’ roles in national journal assessment, it examines the structural, ethical, and financial challenges shaping these models, particularly the tensions between Diamond and Gold Open Access frameworks. The findings indicate a system at a pivotal point, where commercial sustainability often conflicts with the principles of equitable knowledge dissemination. The authors argue that publishing models should be explicitly included as evaluation criteria in national frameworks, such as MyCite, to align with international practices. Recognising publisher credibility, governance, and financial transparency as core indicators of quality would help address existing legitimacy gaps. The article concludes with policy-oriented recommendations to reinforce community-controlled publishing, including the establishment of a National Council of Journal Editors. Such initiatives are vital to preserving Malaysia’s scholarly voice, values, and intellectual heritage within a balanced and globally connected knowledge infrastructure.
Downloads
References
Abd-Shukor, R. (2020). Managing scholarly journals: What editors should know. Bangi, Malaysia: UKM Press.
Abrizah, A. (2016). Performance of Malaysian medical journals. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 23(2), 1–5. http://www.mjms.usm.my/MJMS23022016/01mjms23022016_ ed.pdf
Abrizah, A., Zainab, A. N., Edzan, N. N., & Koh, A. P. (2013). Citation performance of Malaysian scholarly journals in the Web of Science, 2006–2010. Serials Review, 39(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.001.
Brill. (n.d.). Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur'an and Hadith Studies. https://brill.com/view/journals/jqhs/jqhs-overview.xml?format=PRI&language=de&rskey=B8voRX&srsltid=AfmBOorQKBp4wyuGEs-kWYLRJrW1NvCwSedyH8gWCYNk85_1igHZjqA3
Asai, S. (2021). An analysis of revising article processing charges for open access journals between 2018 and 2020. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1334.
Asai, S. (2022). Strategies to increase the number of open access journals: The cases of Elsevier and Springer Nature. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.53.2.0
Black, S. (2003) Scholarly journals should be treated as a public good, The Serials Librarian, 44(1-2), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v44n01_07
Bodaghi, N. B., Sanni, S. A., & Zainab, A. N. (2015). In competition with ISI: the perceptions of chief editors of Malaysian local journals. Learned Publishing, 28(4), 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150404
Borrego, Á. (2023), Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review. Learned Publishing, 36 (3), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1558.
Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science.
Clarivate. (2025). Editorial selection process: Journal evaluation process and selection criteria. https://clarivate.com/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/web-of-science-core-collection/editorial-selection-process/journal-evaluation-process-selection-criteria/.
de Solla Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science- and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dimitrov, K. (2022) : Opportunities and challenges in publishing and promoting scientific journals in Bulgaria. Journal of Management Sciences and Applications (JOMSA), 1, 6-12, https://jomsa.science/index.php/jomsa/article/view/22/7.
Erfanmanesh, M., Tahira, M., & Abrizah, A. (2017). The publication success of 102 nations in Scopus and the performance of their Scopus-indexed journals. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(4), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-017-9540-5.
Frank, J., Foster, R., & Pagliari, C. (2023). Open access publishing – noble intention, flawed reality. Social Science & Medicine, 317, 115592. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.socscimed.2022.115592.
Goyanes M., de-Marcos L., Demeter M., Toth T., Jordá B. (2022) Editorial board interlocking across the social sciences: Modelling the geographic, gender, and institutional representation within and between six academic fields. PLOS ONE 17(9), e0273552. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273552.
Hanson, M. A., Gómez Barreiro, P., Crosetto, P., & Brockington, D. (2024). The strain on scientific publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 823–843. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327.
Haustein, S., Schares, E., Alperin, J. P., Hare, M., Butler, L.-A., & Schönfelder, N. (2024). Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16551.
Hérubel, J. V. M. (2023). University press publishing and the ecology of disciplinary fluidity: General observations. Learned Publishing, 36(2), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1516.
Hopkins, J. (2011). The role of learned societies in knowledge exchange and dissemination: the case of the Regional Studies Association, 1965–2005. History of Education, 40(2), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2010.518161.
International Science Council. (2023, November 17). The case for reform of scientific publishing. https://doi.org/10.24948/2023.14.
Jamali, H. R. (2024). Country names in journal titles: Shaping researchers’ perception of journals quality. Scientometrics, 129, 803–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04904-1.
Jamali, H.R., Wakeling, S. and Abbasi, A. (2022), Scholarly journal publishing in Australia. Learned Publishing, 35(2), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1446.
Kolesnykova, T. O., & Kliushnyk, I. A. (2015). Publication of scientific periodicals at universities: New challenges, participants, technology. Science and Transport Progress, 6(60), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.15802/stp2015/57105.
Nathan, R.J. & Shawkataly, O. (2019). Publications, citations and impact factors: Myth and reality. Australian Universities Review, 61(1), 42-48. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1206806.pdf
Nwagwu, W. E. (2013). Open access initiatives in Africa - Structure, incentives and disincentives. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.024.
Larivière V., Haustein S., & Mongeon P. (2015) The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.
Late, E., Korkeamäki, L., Pölönen, J. & Syrjämäki, S. (2020). The role of learned societies in national scholarly publishing. Learned Publishing, 33(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1270.
Liu, J., Shen, C., Noorhidawati, A., Yanti Idaya Aspura Mohd Khalid, & Jiayi Xu. (2024). Coverage of Malaysian scholarly publications in the Directory of Open Access Journals: An exploratory study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 29(3), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol29no3.5.
Maddi, A., & Sapinho, D. (2022) Article processing charges, altmetrics and citation impact: Is there an economic rationale?. Scientometrics, 127, 7351–7368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04284-y.
Malički, M. & Mehmani B. (2024) Structured peer review: pilot results from 23 Elsevier journals. PeerJ, 12, e17514. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17514.
Ngah, Z. A., Fong, A. T., & Abdullah, A. (2005). E-Journal Publishing in Malaysia: from single journal system to publishing through a host. Information Development, 21(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666905051914.
Oh, D. & Kim, E. (2025). Reflecting on 12 Years: Strategic insights from JISTaP’s development in the evolving Asian LIS publishing ecosystem, Journal of Information Science, Theory and Practice, 13(2), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2025.13.2.6.
Petrou, C. (2023). Guest Post — Reputation and publication volume at MDPI and Frontiers. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/09/18/guest-post-reputation-and-publication-volume-at-mdpi-and-frontiers-the-1b-question/.
Pinfield, S., Salter, J. & Bath, P.A. (2016), The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 1751-1766. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23446.
Pölönen, J., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., Sivertsen, G. & Engels, T.C.E.. (2021). National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(1), 50-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0004.
Pusat Sitasi Malaysia (2013). Prestasi Jurnal Malaysia dalam MyCite: 2012. Putrajaya: Pusat Sitasi Malaysia, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia.
Razlan, N. M., Samsuddin, S. F. ., & Abrizah, A. (2024). Embracing transparency and openness in scholarly publishing: Insights from the Malaysian social sciences researchers. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 29(3), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol29no3.2.
Sammour, R. M. F., & Shahiwala, A. (2023). Discrepancies in open access fees within pharmacology, toxicology, and pharmaceutics journals. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 13(4), 635–638. https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2023.076.
Sohani, F., Shekofteh, M., Shahbodaghi, A., & Jambarsang, S. (2021). Journals on the Road: Open access or non-open access? (2021). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 6276. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6276.
Smaldino, P., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384.
Solomon, D.J. & Björk, B.-C. (2012), A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (8), 1485-1495. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22673.
Springer Nature. (2005). Open access agreement for KONSEPt: Information for authors.https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-science/oa agreements/malaysia/konsortiumsumber-elektronik-pendidikan-tinggi.
Universiti Malaya. (2024). Kajian kebolehlaksanaan (feasibility study) pembangunan dan pelaksanaan National Knowledge Infrastructure (NKI) pendidikan tinggi Malaysia. Jabatan Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi Malaysia. (230 p).
Verma, L. (2021). OJS security analysis issues, reasons, and possible solutions. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 41(5), 391–396. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.5.15975.
Woldeamanuel, A.G. (2025). Peer review: A highly valuable service but less recognized. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(25). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00479-8.
Yeon, A. L. (2021). An overview of high impact law journals in Asian. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12, 10.32890/UUMJLS2021.12.2.11.
Zell, H. (2025). African scholarly journals publishing: Current challenges and prospects. With a select literature review. The African Book Publishing Record, 51(1). https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/abpr/html?lang=en
Zibeline International Publishing. (n.d.). Zibeline conferences. https://www.zibelinepub.com/conferences/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to the journal have not been published, accepted for publication, nor simultaneously submitted for publication elsewhere. By submitting a manuscript, the author(s) agree that copyright for the article is transferred to the publisher, if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication.
